Several things occurred to me last night while we were watching Primary.
1: The camera loves Jackie Kennedy. It was fascinating how much screen time she received compared to Humphrey's wife, who receives virtually none. I loved the shot of Jackie fidgeting with her hands in their pristine white gloves, as it seemed to communicate a vulnerability and innocence not often shown on the campaign trail. Interestingly, although we see her a lot on camera, we don't hear from her much at all. In this sense, her presence is similar to Humphrey's wife, who I believe never addresses the film audience, nor do we see her talking with a filmed audience (as we do with Jackie speaking Polish).
That leads me to point number 2: director Drew was much more interested in the Kennedys' physiques than the Humphreys'. He spends camera time focused on JFK's hands, too, and simply includes more shots that admire JFK and Jackie. In the scene in the gymnasium when Kennedy arrived late, and then he and Jackie stand on the floor shaking hands, has a shot with JFK's hand-shaking in the foreground, but Jackie in the background is clearly the focal point.
To that end, point 3: there are many shots of JFK interacting with a crowd, some even shot with the camera above his head. This is intriguing because a camera shot from below would seem to emphasize stature and authority--are the shots from above meant to humanize JFK? The overhead shots really show the adoration of the crowds much more. I wonder if there simply were no crowds who adored Humphrey in that way. Or was the documentary meant to be on Kennedy's side?
I've wanted to see this documentary for quite some time, and it was different from what I expected. I was surprised by how the director created tension on election night--although I knew the outcome, watching the candidates suffer through the early returns was quite gripping.
October 6 2005, 17:28:09 UTC 6 years ago
women in primary
While I agree with your observation on Jackie O. I want to push the issue a bit further. Concerning Humphry while we rarely see his life we do see him several times in a crowd of yound, anxious and eager women. While on the campagin trail he is often shown appraoching young women and asking for their votes - a favor - in a highly flirtatous manner. His goal seems to be to capture and exploit the women's influence. He asks the repeatedly to, while they might not be able to vote themselves, influence their families and neighbors. He seems to be conscious of the rift between politics and domesticity, teh public and teh private. In a sense, he is asking women to transform the home from a private to a public space. Women are still labeled as conveyors of cultural and moral values of society - both which teh candidates are trying to capitalize upon. It is in these moments of campaigning that we see women with voices. While at first glance it appears empowering, I think it's highly problimatic in the same sense that Jackie's silence in problimatic. We should bring these issues up in class next week.October 7 2005, 00:55:13 UTC 6 years ago
I don't think it's bad that the Kennedys ran on charisma. People do not vote rationally, not even me.
I hope my wife runs for office so I can stand back and exude silent support while her voice takes the fore.
--adam
October 10 2005, 04:05:21 UTC 6 years ago
Jackie O.
i, too, loved the fidgety white gloves.....very "real", in the moment footage....In reading this and other entries about the screen time and attentino given to Jackie, I am reminded of some thoughts i had watching the documentary. I remember being struck by the mention of Kennedy's appearance--his handsome image and classic smile---taking his photograph, specifically comes to mind. Jackie, i think, was certainly a part of this iconological identity. Focusing on her physical presence, her flawless beauty and submissive, silent, support of her flawless and handsome husband emphasized this superfiaical power the couple had over americans. I remember some of the voices of voters commenting only on the way the couple looks rather than on policies, etc. so, Jackie is represented as a pretty face, a pretty sidekick, saying nothing....i'm not sure how i feel about this.....i mean, it is commetary on the part of the documentary's creators, but was it / is it indiciative of american people? hmmmm....